Head to head · Boys' names
James vs John
#6 vs #23 in 2025 · both holding its place on the charts
James is a whisker ahead (#6 vs #23 in 2025) and both are holding its place on the charts. The records will not split these two — sound, story and your own last name will.
Cast your vote
Which one would you pick?
Your gut first, the numbers after — the split shows once you pick.
The tale of the tape
On the charts, James leads 3 measures of 6; John leads 1.
Ranks, counts and years are measured in the official US birth record; the classroom and living figures are estimates computed from it. The dot marks the side each measure favours on the charts — more common, not better.
What the records say
146 years of US births, drawn on one scale
Two curves, one scale
Who owned which decade
- 1880s: James #3, John #1 — John higher
- 1890s: James #3, John #1 — John higher
- 1900s: James #3, John #1 — John higher
- 1910s: James #3, John #1 — John higher
- 1920s: James #4, John #2 — John higher
- 1930s: James #2, John #3 — James higher
- 1940s: James #1, John #3 — James higher
- 1950s: James #2, John #4 — James higher
- 1960s: James #4, John #3 — John higher
- 1970s: James #4, John #6 — James higher
- 1980s: James #7, John #9 — James higher
- 1990s: James #14, John #14
- 2000s: James #17, John #18 — James higher
- 2010s: James #10, John #27 — James higher
- 2020s: James #5, John #25 — James higher
James stood higher in 8 of 14 decades; James has held the lead since the 1970s.
Rank by decade
| Decade | James | John |
|---|---|---|
| 1880s | #3 | #1 |
| 1890s | #3 | #1 |
| 1900s | #3 | #1 |
| 1910s | #3 | #1 |
| 1920s | #4 | #2 |
| 1930s | #2 | #3 |
| 1940s | #1 | #3 |
| 1950s | #2 | #4 |
| 1960s | #4 | #3 |
| 1970s | #4 | #6 |
| 1980s | #7 | #9 |
| 1990s | #14 | #14 |
| 2000s | #17 | #18 |
| 2010s | #10 | #27 |
| 2020s | #5 | #25 |
Average national rank across each decade. A dash means the name sat outside the recorded top of that decade.
Around the world
James
- Canada#8
- Scotland#14
- England & Wales#40
John
- Canada#73
National statistics offices, latest published year.
The names themselves
Meaning, roots, sound and the people who carried each
Where each name comes from
James
From Hebrew Ya'aqov (Jacob) — either "heel" or "holder of the heel/supplanter", or "may God protect"
The Book of Genesis links Jacob to the Hebrew word for heel, since he was born grasping his brother Esau's heel, which gave the traditional reading "supplanter". Semitic scholars instead reconstruct an original Ya'aqov-El, "may God protect". Both readings are seriously held; neither has pushed the other out.
Ya'aqov → Iakobos → Iacomus → James
How it traveled
James and Jacob are, at root, the same name. Hebrew Ya'aqov was written Iakobos by the Greek translators of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament writers, and Iacobus in Latin.
John
Yahweh is gracious
From the Hebrew Yoḥanan, built from the divine name and a root meaning to be gracious or show favor.
Yoḥanan → Iōannēs → Iohannes → Jehan → John
How it traveled
The name begins as Hebrew Yoḥanan, worn by several men in the Hebrew Bible. Greek-speaking writers rendered it Iōannēs, Latin took it as Iohannes, and from there it split into Jean in France, Giovanni in Italy, Juan in Spain, Ivan in the Slavic east.
Where a reading is contested the note says so — this page does not turn a guess into a fact. The chain is each name's recorded forms, oldest first; the story is its opening, told in full on the name's own page.
Out loud, and in short
James
JAYMZ
One syllable everywhere in English. The related forms elsewhere sound quite different — Jacques is ZHAHK, Séamus is SHAY-mus, Santiago is san-tee-AH-go.
- Jim — The standard informal short form for generations; also given on its own, though far less often than as a nickname.
- Jamie — Used for children and adults alike, and independently established as a given name for both boys and girls in English-speaking countries.
- Jimmy — Affectionate form, widely used in childhood and kept into adulthood by many; strongly represented among older generations.
- Jay — Initial-based short form, informal, and a standalone name in its own right.
- Also Jem.
John
JON
One syllable. The h is silent and always has been in English; it survives from the Latin spelling Iohannes.
- Johnny — The standard affectionate form, used across all ages, and long established as a given name in its own right.
- Jack — Grew out of the medieval diminutive Jankin and has been tied to John for centuries; now overwhelmingly used as an independent name.
- Jon — A clipped spelling used both as a short form and as a separate given name; sounds identical to John.
- Johnnie — An older spelling of the same short form, more common among earlier generations.
- Also J.J..
Who has carried each name
James
James Dean (b. 1931) — Rebel Without a Cause icon
James Madison (b. 1751) — "Father of the Constitution" and fourth US president
James Cook (b. 1728) — Explorer who mapped the Pacific
John
John F. Kennedy (b. 1917) — The president who launched America to the Moon
John Lennon (b. 1940) — Beatle who imagined a better world
John Adams (b. 1735) — Founding Father and second US president
Source: Wikidata — the one source on this page that is not an official agency.
Is it right for you
The differences that decide it, laid out by what you want
Choose by what you want
Choose James if you want…
- a name most people already know#6 in 2025, 11,945 babies that year
- a name that charts abroad tooJames is on the national lists of Canada, Scotland and England & Wales
Choose John if you want…
- a name fewer children share#23 in 2025 — roughly 1 in 9 classrooms will have a child named John
Each line is a measured difference between the two names — a rank, a count, a recorded form — never a judgement of either. Save the one that answers your question; it lands on your shortlist.
The trade-offs, name by name
James
Strengths
- Spelled one way and known one way across the entire English-speaking world; almost never misheard or misspelled.
- A deep bench of short forms already in use — Jim, Jimmy, Jamie, Jay — so a boy can choose his own register later.
- Charts in Canada, Scotland, and England & Wales as well as the US, so it crosses borders without translation.
To consider
- It is one of the most heavily used boys' names in American history, so a James will meet other Jameses — in his classroom, on his team, at work.
- Because so many bearers are now in their later years, Jim and Jimmy read as belonging to older generations; the full James and Jamie sit more neutrally.
- It has become a default middle name for many families, which some parents feel makes it less of a statement in the first slot.
John
Strengths
- Everyone can spell it and everyone can say it, in English and well beyond — no correcting, no repeating over the phone.
- Has a form in almost every European language: Juan, Jean, Giovanni, Ivan, Seán, Johannes.
- Carries ready-made short forms with their own long histories, from Johnny to Jack.
To consider
- It has been common for so long that most families already have a John somewhere — a father, an uncle, a grandfather. Worth checking who might feel claimed or skipped over.
- In American slang, "john" means a toilet and also a prostitute's client, and "John Doe" stands for an unidentified person. Old associations, widely known, mostly harmless.
- John and Jon sound identical, so expect the occasional wrong spelling on forms and email.
Documented properties of each name — how it spells, travels and shortens — not opinions about the child.
With your last name
Say both in full. The notes are facts about letters and sound — a rhyme, a shared initial, the monogram — not a verdict on either name.
Type a last name to hear James and John in full.
Weighing the whole shortlist? Run the full comparison — up to eight names with your last name, initials, classroom projections and a printable report.
Decide together
Nobody names a baby alone
Still torn between James and John?
Put both to the vote.
One link to your partner, your parents, your sister. Each of them gets the two names, a one-tap answer and room to say why — and every reply lands in one place.
Free to start · no account needed · everyone you invite votes in one tap
More than two in the running? Settle it with a bracket or run the full comparison with your last name.
More head-to-heads
Same measures, different pair. Sixty more are dealt daily in the arena.
Lists that carry both names
- Names that never go out of style
- Every #1 name in American history
- America's top 100 names right now
- The top-10 club: every name that made it
- all guides
Every list here names both James and John — the same style, ranked by the same records.
James or John — the short answers
- Which is more popular, James or John?
- James, in 2025: James ranked #6 with 11,945 babies; John ranked #23 with 8,027 babies.
- Which name is rising faster, James or John?
- John. Over the last five years James is holding its place on the charts; John moved up 4 places.
- Which is the older name, James or John?
- The US record cannot say: both were already in use when it began in 1880.
- How many people are named James and John?
- About 3,022,000 people named James are estimated to be alive in the US today. About 2,822,000 people named John are estimated to be alive in the US today.
- Will there be other Jamess or Johns in the classroom?
- Roughly 1 in 6 classrooms will have a child named James. Roughly 1 in 9 classrooms will have a child named John.
US figures from the Social Security Administration, 1880–2025; international figures from national statistics agencies. Votes are battle voters on this site, not the birth record. Data & methodology
Keep playing
Sixty more head-to-heads are dealt in the arena every day — or line up James, John and the rest of your shortlist with your last name in one printable report.
Free to start · no account needed · everyone you invite votes in one tap